Two New York Cases Lend Credibility to Trump's Complaint of Partisan Persecution
Neither Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg nor New York Attorney General Letitia James can explain exactly who was victimized by the dishonesty they cite.
Neither Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg nor New York Attorney General Letitia James can explain exactly who was victimized by the dishonesty they cite.
The essence of the case, the Manhattan D.A. says, is that Trump "corrupt[ed] a presidential election" by concealing embarrassing information.
Stella Assange discusses the imprisonment of her husband on the third episode of Just Asking Questions.
Douglass Mackey's case raised questions about free speech, overcriminalization, and a politicized criminal legal system.
The Durham report is a "black eye" for the FBI, leading Democrats, and the media, says Lake.
Join Reason on YouTube Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern with Eli Lake to discuss what the Durham report tells us about the FBI, the media and U.S. politics.
Plus: Reexamining the roots of qualified immunity, who's really hurt by business regulations, and more...
The case against the former president is both morally dubious and legally shaky.
Plus: The editors respond to a listener question concerning corporate personhood.
Headlines about the 34 alleged felonies seem to have obscured newly revealed information about the weakness of the charges.
The continuing ambiguity reflects the legal challenges that Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg faces in transforming one hush payment into 34 felonies.
Prosecutors are counting each record misrepresenting the former president's reimbursement of that payment as a separate crime.
Plus: Debating whether GPT-4 actually understands language, U.S. immigration law stops a college basketball star from scoring, and more...
Plus: the terrible case for pausing A.I. innovation
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is relying on debatable facts and untested legal theories to transform minor misconduct into a felony.
Plus: A listener asks the editors if the nation is indeed unraveling or if she is just one of "The Olds" now.
The case hinges on the claim that the former president tried to cover up a campaign finance violation with which he was never charged.
Plus: Libertarians ask Supreme Court to consider New York ballot access rule change, Wyoming bans abortion pills, and more...
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg reportedly intends to prosecute Trump for falsifying business records.
Alarmists are unfazed by the lack of evidence that "foreign influence campaigns" have affected public opinion or voting behavior.
"I think we need to just call this out on the bullshit it is."
Researchers: Moscow’s social media meddling had little impact on the 2016 election.
There is "no evidence of a meaningful relationship" between Russia's influence campaign on Twitter and the 2016 electoral outcome.
Over time, betting has been a better predictor than polls, pundits, statistical models, and everything else.
She was sentenced to more than five years for revealing how Russia tried to hack the 2016 election.
Plus: The difference between conservatives and libertarians, Utah Supreme Court upholds sex changes on birth certificates, and more...
As long as there have been American elections, foreign powers have sought to influence them.
Republicans have seized on the dubious claims of a psychologist who thinks Big Tech is shifting millions of votes to the left.
Feds now say the national security advisor's lie wasn’t “material” and they cannot prove it.
If you’re invoking an obscure law designed for the purpose of punishing political adversaries, don’t be surprised when it backfires.
Fears of contracting COVID-19 in prison are not enough, Justice Department says
Anyone who wants to restrict free speech should contemplate what it would be like if your enemy gets to choose what gets said.
She’s nearly three years into a five-year sentence for releasing classified documents showing Russian attempts to hack U.S. election systems.
"I like a lot of what she has to say," the former Libertarian Party presidential candidate tells Reason.
An unnecessary and personal attack on Bernie Sanders is another example of Clinton's poor political judgement, and smacks of Democratic desperation to stop the Vermont senator's rise.
In an interview with Fox News, the former FBI director admitted mistakes with the FISA process but defended his team.
The government's surveillance of Carter Page might not have been improperly motivated, but it was still seriously flawed.
New research shows that GOP candidates lost ground in counties that were adversely affected by the trade war. In places without those effects, there were "no discernable gains" for Republicans.
Plus: Oregon's vaping ban is halted, fake rap video money lands a man in jail, and a Syrian ceasefire appears to have already broken down.
Plus: the case for trading with corrupt countries, the problem with current criminal justice reformers, and more...
Plus: Screen addiction is not really a thing and New Mexico embraces tuition-free college.
The study at the source of the viral headline was limited to counting anti-Semitic incidents, many of which were not criminal in nature.
If Moscow aimed to "sow chaos," it needed a much bigger budget.
Plus: human trafficking victims arrested in Florida, Beyoncé and Domino's targeted by disability discrimination suits, and more...
If lawmakers want to impeach Trump they're going to have to deal with the politics of it all and not use the Justice Department as a shield.
Blaming Trump's election on the magical power of Russian Twitter bots is seductive because it excuses Americans for electing an obviously unqualified candidate.
The special counsel has said he wants his report on Russian meddling in the election to speak for itself.
Defending the conservative sensibility in the era of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.