The New York Times Again Worries That Free Speech Endangers Democracy
The newspaper portrays the constitutional challenge to the government's social media meddling as a conspiracy by Donald Trump's supporters.
The newspaper portrays the constitutional challenge to the government's social media meddling as a conspiracy by Donald Trump's supporters.
From limits on liability protections for websites to attempts to regulate the internet like a public utility, these proposals will erode Americans' right to express themselves.
Where are the misinformation czars and the mainstream media fact-checkers now?
Your support makes some of the "riskiest" journalism on the internet possible.
A tricky, excellent legal drama shows just how hard it can be to pin down the truth.
Aside from narrowly defined exceptions, false speech is protected by the First Amendment.
The late California senator always seemed to err on the side of more government power and less individual freedom.
Yoel Roth worries about government meddling in content moderation, except when Democrats target "misinformation."
The appeals court narrowed a preliminary injunction against such meddling but confirmed the threat that it poses to freedom of speech.
The paper worries that "social media companies are receding from their role as watchdogs against political misinformation."
Humanity has always adjusted to the reliability of new information sources.
A new documentary film argues that the second-largest website on the planet is flooded with misinformation. Is that right?
"Disinformation" researchers alarmed by the injunction against government meddling with social media content admire legal regimes that allow broad speech restrictions.
Confirmation of Wuhan scientists as "patients zero" makes the lab leak theory look likely—and the misinformation police look like fools.
"We find that while removing this content does curb some misinformation, it could also have the unintended effect of curtailing political speech."
From Russiagate to COVID discourse, elites in government and the media are trying to control and centralize free speech and open inquiry.
Join Reason on YouTube Thursday at 1 p.m. Eastern for a discussion of Jacob Siegel's broadside against the "counter-disinformation complex" in Tablet magazine.
Plus: More secrecy from the Global Disinformation Index, the public awaits another big Supreme Court abortion decision, and more...
The COVID-19 lab leak theory was labeled "misinformation." Now it's the most plausible explanation.
The legal challenge to censorship by proxy highlights covert government manipulation of online speech.
The Ohio train accident was frightening enough. Spreading inaccurate information won’t help the citizens of East Palestine.
Time and time again, so-called disinformation watchdogs fail their own tests—the lab leak is just the latest example.
The push to label the lab leak thesis a racist conspiracy theory now looks even more foolish.
Plus: The National Endowment for Democracy ends funding of conservative media blacklist, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear major internet free speech case, and more...
A government-supported organization's controversial ratings of online news sources illustrate the challenge of deciding what qualifies as disinformation.
Reason is listed among the "ten riskiest online news outlets" by a government-funded disinfo tracker.
Alarmists are unfazed by the lack of evidence that "foreign influence campaigns" have affected public opinion or voting behavior.
Deepfakes aren't nearly as dangerous as the tried-and-true technique of saying something misleading with the imprimatur of authority.
Plus: House votes to rescind IRS funding, the FDA is putting unnecessary strings on pharmacies filling abortion pill prescriptions, and more...
People in power lean on private businesses to impose authoritarian policies forbidden to the government.
Thanks, but we lived through the lies of their administrations that they used to sell us war and intrusive government meddling in health care.
Journalists who sound the alarm about Russian propaganda are unfazed by the lack of evidence that it has a meaningful impact.
Livestream with Nick Gillespie, Robby Soave, and Zach Weissmueller
Department of Homeland Security
While the Department of Homeland Security pressured tech companies to censor their users' posts, it also branded election deniers as potential terrorists.
The Department of Homeland Security and the FBI regularly report misinformation and disinformation to tech companies for potential removal.
Regular people are not so terminally online.
Amidst official hysteria over “misinformation,” the president continues to willfully misrepresent the facts on firearms.
A new Cato report sheds light on "jawboning," or attempts by state actors "to sway the decisions of private platforms and limit the publication of disfavored speech."
Plus: Don't cry for the failure of Homeland Security's disinformation board, states discover supply-side solutions to labor shortages, and more...
People believe and say things that aren't true all of the time, of course. But efforts by public officials to combat them may well make things worse, not better.
And The Washington Post's wildly one-sided account of Jankowicz's fall was an exercise in government PR.
A "disinformation" board sounds like something from a dystopian novel.
Plus: ruminations on public health, misinformation, and media literacy
This “unprecedented crisis for democracy” is neither unprecedented nor a crisis for democracy.
Plus: perpetual "scope creep" of the welfare state