Gavin Newsom Defies the Supreme Court's 'Very Bad Ruling' on the Right To Bear Arms
California made carry permits easier to obtain but nearly impossible to use.
California made carry permits easier to obtain but nearly impossible to use.
The state's law, which a federal judge enjoined last month, prohibits firearms in most public places.
Local police officials are leery of enforcing Michelle Lujan Grisham's ban on public carry, which gun rights groups have challenged in federal court.
The state defied a Supreme Court ruling by banning guns from myriad "sensitive places."
New study sees Chicago harassing and arresting people for paperwork violations, damaging their ability to live and work, without demonstrable effect on gun violence
A New York Times story about the state's location-specific gun bans glosses over the vast territory they cover.
The city has not granted a single permit since the Supreme Court upheld the right to bear arms last June.
By banning firearms from a wide range of "sensitive places," the state effectively nullified the right to bear arms.
The state's ban applies unless the property owner posts a sign allowing firearms or otherwise gives "express consent."
Bowies were regulated like other knives; knives were sometimes regulated like handguns
Gun Owners of America prevail in Antonyuk v. Hochul
The state made it a felony to carry handguns for self-defense in "any place of worship or religious observation."
Carry permit applicants would have to prove they are not dangerous, and guns would be banned from myriad locations.
Legislators in both states favor subjective standards and sweeping restrictions for carry permits.
Article for Cato Supreme Court Review
Some states promptly eliminated subjective standards, while others refused to recognize the decision's implications.
Plus: America's falling murder clearance rate, the Fed wrestles with inflation, and more...
Faculty/Administrator Safety Training & Emergency Response (FASTER)
The argument for loosening restrictions on armed self-defense goes beyond the measurable impact on public safety.
Lawful gun owners should not be forced to jump through hoops just to exercise basic constitutional rights
The Supreme Court should reject a law that bars ordinary people from carrying guns for self-defense.
New York, like several other states, limits public carrying of handguns to the favored few.
In first Supreme Court Second Amendment case since 2010, Court must decide whether the right applies in any meaningful sense outside the home.
A decade after recognizing a constitutional right to armed self-defense, the Supreme Court remains reluctant to defend it.
Golden State gun owners may soon be an endangered species, and no one is talking about why.
The bill dramatically liberalizes concealed carry laws nationwide.
If you have to ask permission, it's a privilege, not a right. And maybe you shouldn't bother to ask.
The ruling also rejects an "assault weapon" ban, caliber restrictions for long guns, a heavy handgun tax, and registration requirements.
Also, demonstrators carried sex toys around UT Austin to protest the law.
Make love, not liberty? Students urge the state to protect "cocks not glocks" on campus.
A preliminary injunction upholds the Second Amendment right to armed self-defense outside the home.
It already allowed open carry without a permit, as do 25 other states.
The logic may lean that way, but we can't be sure the Court values the Second Amendment's application that strongly.
In practice, licenses to carry guns in public have allowed law-abiding citizens to take steps they see as essential for their safety, without putting their fellow citizens in danger.