Lawsuit Against Society for Creative Anachronism Thrown Out Because It's Untimely
and also because private clubs generally have broad discretion in interpreting their internal rules.
and also because private clubs generally have broad discretion in interpreting their internal rules.
Restricting speech about the world's most pressing problems does not make them go away, nor does it settle any disputes.
Liz Magill and two other university leaders provoked bipartisan outrage by defending freedom of expression on campus.
Younger Americans, in particular, appear to support calls for Palestinian liberation, but do they understand what a common slogan means?
"And in (partial) defense of Harvard President Claudine Gay's controversial congressional testimony."
"Conservatives like Rep. Elise Stefanik should ask themselves: Do you honestly believe this [proposed new rule against "calls for genocide"] won't be weaponized to ban an Israeli cabinet official from speaking at Penn? An Israeli Defense Force soldier?"
"Double standards are frustrating, but we should address them by demanding free speech be protected consistently — not by expanding the calls for censorship."
Plus: Repealing tobacco bans, UN pointlessness, Substack's "Nazi problem," and more…
“We've taught young people that any of their missteps or any of their heterodox opinions are grounds to tear them down. That's no way to grow up.”
“We've taught young people that any of their missteps or any of their heterodox opinions are grounds to tear them down. That's no way to grow up.”
Democrats and Republicans are united in thinking their political agendas trump the First Amendment.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression responds.
Even content creators outside of New York would feel its effects.
"For the most part, the American Civil Liberties Union, Young Americans for Freedom, and the Babylon Bee don't see eye to eye."
Plus: The doubling of the deficit, young Americans souring on college, and more...
A federal judge compared Waylon Bailey’s Facebook jest to "falsely shouting fire in a theatre."
The paper worries that "social media companies are receding from their role as watchdogs against political misinformation."
Langford had been in the news for joining a sorority, which has caused a good deal of controversy at the University of Wyoming.
can go forward, rules a federal judge, denying Cleveland State University's motion to dismiss.
"Disinformation" researchers alarmed by the injunction against government meddling with social media content admire legal regimes that allow broad speech restrictions.
notwithstanding the First Amendment.
At this rate, the Southern Poverty Law Center's notorious hate map might eventually describe everyone as an extremist.
Prosecutors and police had read the law, which restricts "advertisements," as broadly banning racial slurs; the Connecticut court read it, as written, to restrict only commercial advertisements.
"Today's decision is a victory for the First Amendment that should be celebrated by everyone who hopes to see the internet continue as a place where even difficult and contentious issues can be debated and discussed freely," said one attorney.
Plus: Government regulation of speech is on trial, biohackers flock to experimental charter city in Honduras, and more…
At the World Economic Forum, Brian Stelter and panelists discuss why everything is Facebook's fault.
A defendant had argued that she could allow Black Lives Matters posters but forbid MAGA hats on the theory that, "While the Black Lives Matter poster is a symbol of cultural acceptance and inclusivity ... Mr. Dodge's MAGA hat is a symbol commonly associated with white supremacy and other anti-immigrant sentiments." No, says a Ninth Circuit panel.