Does The 1619 Project Have Anything To Teach Us?
Two historians go head-to-head on whether the controversial New York Times project has any value.
Two historians go head-to-head on whether the controversial New York Times project has any value.
Two historians go head-to-head on whether the controversial New York Times project has any value.
The first episode paints an enslaver, plantation master, and Royalist autocrat as a leading and even celebrated agent of emancipation.
The intellectual watchdog keeps tabs on everyone from The 1619 Project's Nikole Hannah-Jones to Mises Institute's Hans-Hermann Hoppe in the name of serious scholarship.
Libertarian History/Philosophy
Intellectual watchdog Phil Magness talks Nikole Hannah-Jones, Nancy MacLean, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, and Kevin Kruse.
It's not supporting “parents’ rights” to censor topics at private schools that families decide to send their children to.
State-level "gag orders" on teaching certain texts and ideas are terrible and utterly predictable in a one-size-fits-all K-12 educational system.
Nikole Hannah-Jones' new book sidesteps scholarly critics while quietly deleting previous factual errors.
You are not for school choice or parents’ rights when you try to ban race and LGBT subjects in private education.
Despite all the controversy it has courted, Woody Holton's newest book doesn't stray very far from other scholarly interpretations of the American Revolution.
Linguist John McWhorter on the ways social justice activists have betrayed black Americans.
State legislatures have leeway to regulate K-12 curriculum, but attempting the same on college campuses is a violation of academic freedom.
The 1619 Project author thinks Terry McAuliffe had it right.
The octogenarian columnist has a lot to say about happiness and history in the United States.
Amar explains how Roberts and Sotomayor messed up Marbury.
"For cases involving an enslaved person as a party, use the parenthetical '(enslaved party).'"
Forget Robin DiAngelo, Ibram X. Kendi, and The 1619 Project. Start with ending the drug war, says the Columbia University linguist.
The New York Times columnist and Columbia University linguist on the "new religion" he says has "betrayed Black America."
"Feldman contends that [Jefferson] Davis was right and Lincoln was wrong."
One of the hardest political lessons to learn is that pocketbook issues are the main driving force of electoral successes and failures.
People are increasingly tolerant of racial differences.
What the author gets right—and wrong—about educational freedom
The Washington Post columnist says President Joe Biden isn't a progressive but "will go where the [Democratic] party goes, and the party is being driven by other people."
NYU's Eliza Sweren-Becker debates Hans von Spakovsky of The Heritage Foundation
When government "gets out of the way, we're going to see again, the creativity of the American people," says the 80-year-old optimist.
Families looking for alternatives to battlefields of the culture war have a bonanza of educational options.
While libertarians will be inclined to applaud some of the new laws, others exemplify familiar conservative excesses.
A new book pulls the curtain back—but only partway.
It's wrong for politicians to suppress important debates in schools. Instead let families have more control of their kids' educations.
Conservatives should be fighting to open universities up, not to close them down
The surprising move raises concerns about academic freedom.
A new book explicates the escaped slave and renowned orator's argument that the Constitution is "a glorious liberty document" that justified ending slavery.
The escaped slave called the Constitution "a glorious liberty document" that justified extending equality to blacks and women.
Socialism: Not so popular among those who remember it well.
"It says a lot about an organization when it breaks it's [sic] own rules and goes after one of it's [sic] own," the union tweeted. "The act, like the article, reeks."
Bret Stephens, in what may be his last NYT column, tracks the foundational rewriting of the 1619 Project.
The New York Times tried to disassociate itself from a claim its reporter made just a few days ago.
Independent education means a wide range of approaches as to what children are taught.
The redefinition of the term diminishes actual victims of violence and trivializes why people are protesting.
Economic historian Phillip W. Magness on classical liberalism and abolition, Abraham Lincoln's contested legacy, and why history matters in contemporary politics.
In a new collection, the economic historian documents how classical liberals pushed for abolition and equality in 19th-century America.
A history professor disputed some of Nikole Hannah-Jones's claims about slavery and the American Revolution.
In this worldview, redemption for the founding seems impossible.
To reduce conflict over classroom lessons, let people choose their kids’ education.
"Mandating the use of The 1619 Project in K-12 curricula is at best premature until these issues are resolved."
As part of its ambitious “1619” inquiry into the legacy of slavery, The New York Times revives false 19th century revisionist history about the American founding.