Universities Use DEI Statements To Enforce Groupthink
DEI statements are political litmus tests.
DEI statements are political litmus tests.
Plus: A listener asks if there is any place libertarians can go to start their own country or city state.
"If we can't trust ourselves as a culture to accommodate ideas we don't like," the novelist said at the Library of Congress, "then our ideas lose their value as well, because they become authoritarian."
A member of Congress weighs in, and the university president speaks out
An Israeli minister demands that Princeton University prohibit a professor from assigning a controversial book
A response to Porter v. North Carolina State University
State tries to bar Stanford researchers from testifying against it
Professor suspended for criticizing policies of Texas lieutenant governor
Texas A&M placed a professor on paid leave for criticizing Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick in a lecture on the opioid crisis.
Blame university administrators.
Political appointees should have no role in faculty hiring decisions.
Is "intramural" professorial speech protected by the First Amendment?
But Chris Rufo bragged about breaking the law anyway.
Doctor sanctioned for comments to journalists about transgender athletes
James Madison University's debate team says that "free speech should not extend to requiring us to platform or amplify ideas that are exclusionary, discriminatory, or hostile."
Martha Pollack rejects the pernicious premise that universities should protect students from offensive ideas.
How bad is that divisive concepts bill?
Legislative showdown looming on tenure and academic freedom
North Dakota attack on tenure barely defeated
"Professors are not mouthpieces for the government," says FIRE's Joe Cohn. "For decades, the Supreme Court of the United States has defended professors' academic freedom from governmental intrusion."
The bill now bans a battery of poorly-defined "Critical Theory" concepts, and prevents schools from funding programs that promote "diversity, equity, and inclusion."
A poorly drafted and conceptually ambitious upending of norms of state university independence
Some of the proposals pose real threats to free inquiry
Florida's H.B. 999 claims to support "viewpoint diversity" and "intellectual rigor." It does just the opposite.
"My artwork is unapologetic," said the artist. "Sometimes it can be very political. Sometimes it can be very controversial."
Amna Khalid and Jeffrey Aaron Snyder argue that we should not kid ourselves about the threat university DEI bureaucracies pose to academic freedom, but is there a better way?
"Hamline subjected López Prater to the foregoing adverse actions because . . . she did not conform her conduct to the specific beliefs of a Muslim sect," the lawsuit states.
Retraction Watch prevails in a California appellate case.
"If Hamline won't listen to free speech advocates or faculty across the country, they'll have to listen to their accreditor," said FIRE attorney Alex Morey, who filed the complaint.
"Students were misreading exam questions at an astonishing rate," says Maitland Jones Jr.
Prominent social psychologist and NYU professor calls the requirement “explicitly ideological.”
The policy, released this week, places unconstitutional prohibitions on faculty speech.
More universities than ever are now requiring lengthy DEI statements from job applicants. Is that good for academic freedom?
A new survey from FIRE shows one-third of college students report it is “sometimes” or “always” acceptable to shout down a controversial campus speaker.
The best-selling author of Why People Believe Weird Things sees a fundamental clash between wokeness and scientific inquiry.
The science writer and journalist talks identity politics, wokeness, trans athletes, and why his goal is to find out what is true rather than to "be right."
A conversation with Eugene Volokh about the Shapiro controversy and political statements by university leaders
$50K in funding was withdrawn by a Brooklyn councilwoman, and transferred to a different organization.
My new article on academic freedom now online at the Houston Law Review