The Ethics of Law Professor Amicus Briefs Revisited
Are law professors too quick to sign their names on briefs submitted to courts? Is this a problem?
Are law professors too quick to sign their names on briefs submitted to courts? Is this a problem?
Notre Dame law Prof. Derek Muller so finds in a new analysis of law professor political donations between 2017 and 2023.
Harvard should pick someone with academic integrity as its next president.
There's increasing evidence that standardized tests accurately measure student achievement and are helpful, not hurtful, to disadvantaged applicants.
DEI statements are political litmus tests.
The next president should put more effort into fixing the college's abysmal free speech ranking.
When people from historically privileged groups are facing censorship, that doesn't mean people in historically marginalized groups are actually being empowered.
The author of Reform Nation explains how celebrity, philanthropy, and activism produced the most significant prison reform in decades.
The epidemiology of food and drink is a mess.
The epidemiology of food and drink is a mess.
How to battle identity politics and defend liberal values of universalism, free speech, and open inquiry
Econ Journal Watch asked academics with high citation counts to pick their most underappreciated article. I participated in the project, along with a number of prominent scholars from various disciplines.
The country's current struggles show the problems of the Beijing way—and make the case for freedom.
The guidelines would ignore decades of academic findings about how firm concentration can have a positive impact on consumers' welfare.
Thankfully, you don't need fancy dining halls or a college degree to have a good life or get a good job.
Some ideas that might help you make better use of the opportunities available to you in law school.
Political appointees should have no role in faculty hiring decisions.
"The greatest thing that ever happened to me was to be born in a free country of modest means and to have opportunities," says the Nobel Prize–winning economist.
Legal scholar and blogger Eric Segall puts forward several excellent suggestions.
Martha Pollack rejects the pernicious premise that universities should protect students from offensive ideas.
A defense of institutional neutrality.
Greetings from the second International Conspiracy Theory Symposium, where one of the most cited findings in the field has been debunked.
"Professors are not mouthpieces for the government," says FIRE's Joe Cohn. "For decades, the Supreme Court of the United States has defended professors' academic freedom from governmental intrusion."
The bill now bans a battery of poorly-defined "Critical Theory" concepts, and prevents schools from funding programs that promote "diversity, equity, and inclusion."
A NewYorker essay on why no one studies English anymore.
By an amazing coincidence, a current property dispute is occurring at the site of a storied property law case.
Florida's H.B. 999 claims to support "viewpoint diversity" and "intellectual rigor." It does just the opposite.
Amna Khalid and Jeffrey Aaron Snyder argue that we should not kid ourselves about the threat university DEI bureaucracies pose to academic freedom, but is there a better way?
Should conservatives worry about breaking the norm of political non-interference with state universities?
The Florida governor unveiled some big new ideas -- not all of them good
"Hamline subjected López Prater to the foregoing adverse actions because . . . she did not conform her conduct to the specific beliefs of a Muslim sect," the lawsuit states.
Jonathan Mitchell failed in his effort to become a legal academic, so he put his theories into practice instead.
U.S. News and World Report is making some significant changes to the way it ranks law schools.
These are the people who showed up when the economy was shut down by the government, working in jobs labeled "essential."
The journalist and comedian makes the case that "new puritans" espousing the religion of social justice have captured the Western world.
Andrew Doyle on the "new puritans" and their godawful religion of social justice.
Prominent social psychologist and NYU professor calls the requirement “explicitly ideological.”
The EconTalk host and Wild Problems author talks about the limits of cost-benefit analyses.
More universities than ever are now requiring lengthy DEI statements from job applicants. Is that good for academic freedom?
The intellectual watchdog keeps tabs on everyone from The 1619 Project's Nikole Hannah-Jones to Mises Institute's Hans-Hermann Hoppe in the name of serious scholarship.
The host of EconTalk and author of Wild Problems says our biggest decisions don't submit to easy cost-benefit analyses.
Some ideas that might help you make better use of the opportunities available to you in law school.
A new study sheds interesting light on these questions.
His 2000 thesis on civil-rights-era Atlanta lifts passages from other people's work.
Listen to an Intelligence Squared US debate featuring Nick Gillespie.
Doing away with standardized testing doesn't help low-income applicants gain entry to elite colleges.