Sheriff Who Presided Over Violent 'Goon Squad' Tries To Play Dumb
"Nobody's ever reported that to me," Rankin County Sheriff Bryan Bailey said after his deputies admitted to brutalizing innocent people.
"Nobody's ever reported that to me," Rankin County Sheriff Bryan Bailey said after his deputies admitted to brutalizing innocent people.
Several justices seemed troubled by an ATF rule that purports to ban bump stocks by reinterpreting the federal definition of machine guns.
His lawyers assert presidential immunity and discretion, criticize an "unconstitutionally vague" statute, and question the special counsel's legal status.
The essence of the case, the Manhattan D.A. says, is that Trump "corrupt[ed] a presidential election" by concealing embarrassing information.
"The sole basis for targeting Joe was the race/ethnicity of his wife and her occupation" at an Asian massage parlor, the lawsuit claims.
The justices seem inclined to revise or ditch a 1984 precedent that requires deference to executive agencies' statutory interpretations.
Excessive judicial deference gives administrative agencies a license to rewrite the law in their favor.
The story shows what can happen when those accused of misconduct are subjected to opaque investigations with little due process.
Letting state officials determine whether a candidate has "engaged in insurrection" opens a huge can of worms.
Ralph Petty's "conflicted dual-hat arrangement" as an advocate and an adjudicator was "utterly bonkers," Judge Don Willett notes.
Another climate change lawsuit filed on behalf of children, this time against the Environmental Protection Agency.
After public backlash, Hanover County Commission has decided to pursue a voluntary purchase of the Cheetah Premier Gentlemen's Club next door.
a few comments on the oral arguments in SEC v. Jarkesy
The political push behind the law was well-meaning. But it will backfire on many prospective renters.
The Supreme Court will consider whether federal agencies’ administrative judges violate the Seventh Amendment.
Wayne County was seizing cars and using its less-fortunate residents as piggy banks.
The Trump administration’s unilateral ban on bump stocks turned owners of those rifle accessories into felons.
Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar falsely claims a federal gun ban "requires individualized findings of dangerousness."
In an upcoming Supreme Court case, the Cato Institute argues that the "threadbare procedures" required by federal law provide inadequate protection for constitutional rights.
Without a prompt post-seizure hearing, people can lose their property for months or years even when they ultimately get it back.
School officials in three states are effectively immune from lawsuits over excessive corporal punishment. A Louisiana mother is asking the Supreme Court to step in.
Mississippi only gives property owners 10 days to challenge a blight finding that could lead to their house being seized through eminent domain.
After a divided ruling, laws limiting such treatments in Tennessee and Kentucky will go into force.
Reason reported in 2021 how prisons use cheap field kits to test mail for contraband—and use the faulty, unconfirmed results to severely punish inmates.
The case is just one example of miscalculations that routinely keep Louisiana prisoners behind bars after they complete their sentences.
A federal circuit judge writes that Detroit's vehicle seizure scheme "is simply a money-making venture—one most often used to extort money from those who can least afford it."
"[T]he Government argue[d] that when considering that the charged offenses occurred after the acquittal, the [appellant's] tactics were emboldened and this factor weighs in favor of admissibility."
Maurice Jimmerson finally got a trial after a decade of pretrial detention. It ended in a hung jury.
The 11th Circuit rejected Sosa's constitutional claims, and he is asking the Supreme Court to intervene.
Civil forfeiture is a highly unaccountable practice. The justices have the opportunity to make it a bit less so.
A divided panel concludes the plaintiffs are unlikely to prevail on the merits and pledges to expedite the appeal.
The Supreme Court was wrong to deny relief to a man imprisoned for activity that Court's own rulings indicate was not illegal - one who never had an opportunity to challenge his incarceration on that basis.
The Colorado Supreme Court holds that the state constitution precludes revival of claims on which the statute of limitations has expired.
The FAIR Act includes several substantial reforms that would make it harder to take property from innocent owners through civil forfeiture.
Maurice Jimmerson has spent 10 years in jail awaiting trial for a 2013 murder charge.
In a federal lawsuit on behalf of legal U.S. residents from China, the ACLU argues that "Florida's New Alien Land Law" is unconstitutional.
Prosecutors dropped the case after interviewing 35 witnesses who contradicted the accuser.
To address an "unpaid debt bubble," the proposed law would dictate contract terms and require regulators to intervene in commercial disputes.
In 2013, Maurice Jimmerson was charged with murder. Ten years later, he's still languishing in a Dougherty County jail, awaiting trial.
It's one small victory for free speech and due process, but similar battles continue to play out elsewhere.
The Court will determine whether the Due Process Clause prevents the government from using asset forfeiture to seize property and hold it for many months without a timely hearing.
Evan Gershkovich was arrested in Russia last month on espionage charges. If convicted, he faces up to 20 years in a penal colony.
U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Neomi Rao suggests the full court needs to consider this question en banc.
The Oregon DMV knew about the problem, but it "wasn't at a high enough level to understand the urgency" of the need to fix it.