Will the Supreme Court Let Sylvia Gonzalez Sue the Political Enemies Who Engineered Her Arrest?
"Mayors should not be allowed to launder animus through warrants," the former city council member's lawyer told the justices.
"Mayors should not be allowed to launder animus through warrants," the former city council member's lawyer told the justices.
Hours before the president said "no one should be jailed" for marijuana use, his Justice Department was saying no one who uses marijuana should be allowed to own guns.
State officials “jawboned” financial firms into cutting ties with the gun-rights group.
The Biden administration’s social media meddling went far beyond "information" and "advice."
If partisans have one thing in common, it's confirmation bias.
The justices established guidelines for determining whether that is true in any particular case.
Plus: Cuba's collapse, D.C.'s crime rate, Austin's housing market, and more...
Several justices seemed concerned that an injunction would interfere with constitutionally permissible contacts.
The newspaper portrays the constitutional challenge to the government's social media meddling as a conspiracy by Donald Trump's supporters.
The Institute for Justice says its data show that a century-old Supreme Court doctrine created a huge exception to the Fourth Amendment.
"Following the science" as the Supreme Court considers the safety and efficacy of medical abortions.
Even as they attack the Biden administration's crusade against "misinformation," Missouri and Louisiana defend legal restrictions on content moderation.
I argue that the justices botched the legal analysis and relied too much on questionable policy considerations.
New Jersey fishermen are challenging a 40-year-old precedent that gives executive agencies too much power.
A leading originalist legal scholar explains what the Court got wrong.
Some liberals and progressives think Justice Sotomayor should retire this year to ensure a Democratic President names her replacement.
Plus: More reactions to the Supreme Court's other decision in the Trump ballot disqualification case, D.C.'s continued minimum wage confusion, California's primary elections, and more...
There are reasons to suspect the justices were wrangling over language up until the last minute.
Plus: A listener asks the editors for short quotes from fictional works that are representative of libertarian ideas.
Three justices who concurred in that judgment accuse the majority of trying to "insulate all alleged insurrectionists from future challenges" by going further than necessary.
Salina, Kansas, restaurant owner Steve Howard argues in a new lawsuit that the city's sign regulations violate the First Amendment.
A federal judge ruled that three men who committed nonviolent felonies decades ago are entitled to buy, own, and possess guns.
The justices reframed the question presented in the case and expedited its consideration.
Plus: Balkan begging, California corruption, Russian gravediggers, and more...
Several justices seemed troubled by an ATF rule that purports to ban bump stocks by reinterpreting the federal definition of machine guns.
The First Amendment restricts governments, not private platforms, and respects editorial rights.
Supreme Court arguments about two social media laws highlight a dangerous conflation of state and private action.
In Cargill v. Garland, the Court should apply the National Firearms Act text that Congress did enact, and not the text that gun control advocates wish had been enacted.
The Supreme Court seems inclined to recognize that content moderation is protected by the First Amendment.
The laws violate the First Amendment because they require social media sites to abjure most content moderation, and platform speech they disapprove of.
The real crisis seems to be in academia, not at the Court
Both states are trying to force tech companies to platform certain sorts of speech.
Philip Esformes was sentenced for charges on which a jury hung. After receiving a commutation, the federal government vowed to try to put him back in prison.
Did we get a hint to the outcome in one of this term's bigger cases at today's oral argument?
Thomas agreed with the Court's decision to not take up two challenges to New York's rent stabilization law but said the constitutionality of rent control "is an important and pressing question."
The Supreme Court's docket may be awfully small, but it's not Justice Kavanaugh's fault.
The Court also rejects a late-filed amicus briefs from the American Bar Association, but accepts one from former FDA Commissioners.
Ralph Petty likely violated the Constitution. In a rare move, a federal court signaled this week that lawsuits against him may not be dead on arrival.
An analysis of appeals involving the doctrine finds that less than a quarter "fit the popular conception of police accused of excessive force."
The Supreme Court supposedly put an end to “home equity theft” last year. But some state and local governments have found a loophole.
Most of the justices are clearly inclined to reject a Colorado Supreme Court decision asserting that power under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
A federal judge allowed a lawsuit against the officers to proceed, finding evidence of several constitutional violations.
Things you may have missed between the Trump disqualification case, Biden special counsel report, and NBA trade deadline.
The justices might well overrule the Colorado Supreme Court on the grounds that only Congress has power to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Such a ruling would be a serious mistake.
Rejecting a challenge to the state's strict gun laws, the court is openly contemptuous of Second Amendment precedents.
The Biden administration's interference with bookselling harks back to a 1963 Supreme Court case involving literature that Rhode Island deemed dangerous.