The Supreme Court's Grant in Trump v. U.S. (UPDATED)
The justices reframed the question presented in the case and expedited its consideration.
The justices reframed the question presented in the case and expedited its consideration.
Several justices seemed troubled by an ATF rule that purports to ban bump stocks by reinterpreting the federal definition of machine guns.
The Supreme Court snubbed Sidney Powell and a court orders Mike Lindell to pay up.
The essence of the case, the Manhattan D.A. says, is that Trump "corrupt[ed] a presidential election" by concealing embarrassing information.
The appeals court says it "cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter."
The Justice Department is wasting no time seeking to put this zombie litigation out of its misery, and the plaintiffs are not happy about it.
A watchdog group cites ATF "whistleblowers" who describe a proposed policy that would be plainly inconsistent with federal law.
Under the Controlled Substances Act, the agency does not have the discretion to "deschedule marijuana altogether."
The new libertarian president believes in free markets and the rule of law. When people have those things, prosperity happens.
Some candid remarks at the University of California at Berkeley
Will Judge Aiken finally accede to the law and allow this particular climate case to end?
His understanding of effective leadership and policing should repel anyone who cares about civil liberties and the rule of law.
The justices seem inclined to revise or ditch a 1984 precedent that requires deference to executive agencies' statutory interpretations.
Excessive judicial deference gives administrative agencies a license to rewrite the law in their favor.
That's bad news for Americans.
As one appeals court judge pointed out, Trump's defense could literally let a president get away with murder.
Judge Aiken's reckless defiance of legal rules is turning the "Kids Climate Case" into a zombie climate case.
The former Attorney General disagrees with me on whether state and local government climate change lawsuits belong in federal court.
His lawyers say no jury can ever consider charges based on his "official acts" as president, which include his efforts to reverse Joe Biden's election.
Yet another federal circuit court of appeals rejects energy company removal claims.
Another climate change lawsuit filed on behalf of children, this time against the Environmental Protection Agency.
Justice Jackson notes her objection to the Court's standard practice of vacating lower court decisions rendered moot by the prevailing party below.
The Trump administration’s unilateral ban on bump stocks turned owners of those rifle accessories into felons.
The Court is taking more cases from the Fifth Circuit, and its decisions do not appear to be faring well.
Is Common Good Constitutionalism anything more than politics by other means?
We need less intrusive law enforcement, not the treatment of crime as a lark.
An emergency proclamation by Gov. Josh Green offers developers the opportunity to route around almost all regulations on building homes.
Geoffrey Swenson’s book Contending Orders tackles Afghanistan and Timor-Leste.
Plus: A listener inquires about the potential positive effects of ranked-choice voting reforms.
The judges recognize that Congress ended their ability to review the Mountain Valley Pipeline, but they seem none too happy about it.
The nature of their conduct is a better indicator of the punishment they deserve.
The Supreme Court vacated a stay entered by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
It's a short-sighted approach that distracts us from the more important question.
The furious response to a seemingly modest reform reflects a broader dispute about the role of courts in a democracy.
Judge Rao's 2022 Canary lecture has now been published in the Case Western Reserve Law Review.
Contrary to popular perception, the current Supreme Court overturns precedent and declares laws to be unconstitutional less often than its predecessors did.
The appeals court judge argued that the Israeli Supreme Court had usurped the role of legislators.
Lai's media company covered the Communist government's abuses when other Hong Kong media wouldn't.
The President strongly criticized the Supreme Court's recent decisions, but refuses to endorse radical reform.
Chief Justice John Roberts decisively rejected the independent state legislature theory.
We once ranked No. 4 in the world, according to the Heritage Foundation. Now we're 25th.
If the Florida governor wants better behavior, he should model better behavior.
Could the Court treat Justice Powell's Bakke opinion the way it treated Justice Kennedy's Rapanos opinion?
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch highlights a vital lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Plus: A listener asks if the Roundtable has given the arguments of those opposed to low-skilled immigration a fair hearing.
J.D. Vance and Co. are trying to give themselves permission to wield public power unconstitutionally.
Why the businessman launched a long shot campaign for the presidency.
The former president reminds us that claiming unbridled executive power is a bipartisan tendency.