How the EPA's New Emissions Rule Is Likely To Backfire
While drafted with good intentions, the rule prioritizes electric vehicles that run on batteries, even as hybrids see strong sales growth.
While drafted with good intentions, the rule prioritizes electric vehicles that run on batteries, even as hybrids see strong sales growth.
Another climate change lawsuit filed on behalf of children, this time against the Environmental Protection Agency.
The Edison Electric Institute submitted comments clarifying that although it supports the EPA's goal of decarbonization, the technologies being presented are not sufficiently proven effective.
The group stresses that it supports the government's ultimate goal of electrification, but the method of achieving that goal should be realistic.
As long as government policies continue to fan the flames of extreme wildfires, we’ll suffer the consequences.
The Supreme Court is agnostic on questions of science, but clear and resolute on questions of law.
If you want to keep the lights on, it might be a good time to shop for a generator.
Thanks to Sackett v. EPA, the feds can no longer treat a backyard puddle like it's a lake.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2022 that the agency lacked the authority to regulate the entire energy industry at once, but the Biden administration is taking another swing at it anyway.
Plus: More details emerge on Fox News' firing of Tucker Carlson, Aubrey Plaza shills for Big Milk, Biden announces he's running for president, and more...
The Biden administration wants as many as two-thirds of all new vehicles sold in the U.S. by 2032 to be electric. But the market should decide how to make that switch.
Hopefully the Supreme Court will soon put a permanent stop to the EPA's Clean Water Act land grab.
The Biden administration is the third administration in a row to fail to issue Clean Water Act regulations that pass judicial scrutiny.
A Ninth Circuit opinion concludes that when a federal agency seeks a voluntary remand of a contested rule, that is not enough to vacate the regulation.
Plus: Did the Pentagon shoot down a hobby radio balloon?, Kentucky abortion ban can be enforced, and more...
Despite what you may have heard, many "recyclables" sent to recycling plants are never recycled at all.
If SCOTUS finds in favor of a small-town Idaho couple in Sackett v. EPA, it could end the federal government's jurisdiction over millions of acres of land.
Will a new commission at the U.S. Department of Agriculture solve racism? We're going to find out.
The justices wrestled with the problem of identifying a clear, coherent, and administrable definition to constrain federal regulatory jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act.
Ten years after their unanimous Supreme Court victory against the Environmental Protection Agency, the Sacketts return to One First Street for another round.
My forthcoming article the good, the bad, and the likely implications of the Supreme Court's decision West Virginia v. EPA
“Without full briefing and argument,” Kagan objects, the Court is quietly resolving major disputes.
I asked scholars, podcasters, and passersby how they'd change the nation's founding charter. Here's what they told me.
Any future regulations will require clear authorization from Congress.
Environmental Protection Agency
No matter how the Supreme Court rules in West Virginia v. EPA, absent legislative action it is unlikely new power plant rules will be in force before 2024.
The activists who say otherwise are wrong on the costs and wrong on the science.
Plus: Why high inflation is getting more attention than low unemployment, how to make supply chains more resilient, and more...
Environmental Protection Agency
Congressional Democrats are insisting on expensive green tech, even though USPS is in desperate financial condition.
The president's anticipated executive order stopped short of feared regulations but suggests federal unease with uncontrolled development.
At today's oral argument, the justices explored Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, the major questions doctrine, justiciability and the regulation of advertising for four-foot cigars smoked through hookahs.
The most important environmental case of the 2021-22 term will be heard next week.
The Solicitor General and NGO respondents argue that the petitioners lack appellate standing to challenge the D.C. Circuit's interpretation of the Section 111 of the Clean Air Act.
Michael and Chantell Sackett say they shouldn't have to spend years—and hundreds of thousands of dollars—just getting permission to build on their suburban lot.
The Sacketts get a return trip to the Supreme Court.
The lawsuit could be a bellwether of how federal agencies must handle a burgeoning private space industry.
Perhaps surprisingly, the Biden Administration is not pushing an expansive interpretation of federal regulatory jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act.
A partially divided panel concludes the Environmental Protection Agency may not regulate trailers as “motor vehicles.”
A surprising grant of certiorari places a high-stakes regulatory case on the Court's docket, with profound implications for EPA authority to regulate greenhouse gases.
"The quality of life we have even during COVID is so much higher than anything humanity experienced, and it's only going to get better."
"You have showers where I can't wash my hair properly. It's a disaster!" said Trump in 2015.
The D.C. Circuit rejected the Trump Administration's approach to regulating power plant emissions of greenhouse gases. Some states and industry groups want the Supreme Court to take a look.
Environmental Protection Agency
The Sackett's' litigation with the Environmental Protection Agency has continued, and may provide the Court with a new opportunity to consider the scope of federal regulatory jurisdiction.
The Trump Administration's Clean Water Act rule will remain in place while the Biden Administration works on a replacement.
The Biden Administration suffers a significant setback in its efforts to curb fossil fuel development.
The goal is to drastically reduce the population of disease-carrying bloodsuckers.
Senate Democrats vote to repeal a Trump Administration regulation easing restrictions on methane emissions.
If there is an urgent need for emission reductions, regulatory ossification and legal risks counsel the consideration of other approaches, such as a carbon tax.
Rioters who ransacked a Senate office may have prevented a few Trump policies from taking effect.