The Ethics of Law Professor Amicus Briefs Revisited
Are law professors too quick to sign their names on briefs submitted to courts? Is this a problem?
Are law professors too quick to sign their names on briefs submitted to courts? Is this a problem?
"Lawyers in litigation may be expected to assume the risk of a certain amount of rough-and-tumble. Their families do not. In preying on the families of opposing counsel, Mr. Manookian crossed the Rubicon."
"he might want to consider hiring an attorney to represent him in this case."
Some candid remarks at the University of California at Berkeley
The relationship between scholarly amicus briefs and scholarship
The provisions seem sensible, though there are legitimate concerns about enforcement.
The matter involves a Wall Street Journal interview of Justice Alito, which didn't discuss the case in which one of the interviewers is a party.
My amicus brief to the Third Circuit argues that the district court appropriately sanctioned the Philadelphia D.A.'s Office for making misleading representations about whether they had conferred with a crime victims' family.
Ethics allegations have been raised against Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Sonia Sotomayor. Both sides have retreated into whataboutism.
"at a hearing in which the judge’s impartiality and temperament were questioned.”
The sanctions imposed on Sidney Powell and other attorneys raising frivolous challenges to the 2020 election were narrowed and slightly reduced, but largely upheld.
"Overwhelmingly impressed by the technology, I excitedly used it to find case law that supports my client's position, or so I thought."
"I felt ... my efficiency ... could be exponentially augmented to the benefit of my clients by expediting the time-intensive research portion of drafting."
The certificates must "attest[] either that no portion of the filing was drafted by generative artificial intelligence (such as ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, or Google Bard) or that any language drafted by generative artificial intelligence was checked for accuracy, using print reporters or traditional legal databases, by a human being."
Jenna Ellis admitted that she made 10 false claims while representing the former president and his campaign.
A trial judge's decision to hold Donald Trump in contempt for failing to comply with a demand for documents is upheld.
Lawyers who indulged the former President are discovering such conduct has costs.
Sloppy legal filings against Democratic political operatives may end up costing some of Trump's lawyers.
To be precise, it's not an ethical violation, when opposing counsel e-mails you cc'ing their clients, and you Reply All. (But some states disagree.)